Nickel and CVOC's
Source: Metal treatment
Partner: Antea Group Belgium
Location: Flanders, Belgium
Due to former surface treatment activities of metals, the subsoil was polluted. The contamination consists of Nickel and CVOC’s from just beneath the concrete slab to 4m-bgl. The unsaturated source zone has been removed. No DNAPL seemed to be present in the saturated zone, but also no natural attenuation of the CVOC’s seemed to happen.
We used mass fluxes to determine the source and plume strengths. A groundwater and contaminant transport model had been built by Antea and was further calibrated by the iFLUX mass flux results.
- Installation of 2 control planes, one in the source and one in the plume zone
- Every control plane consisted of 3 to 4 clusters of respectively 3 monitoring wells at 3 different depths.
- A total of 44 iFLUX cartridges have been exposed
- Exposure time: 10 weeks
"Flux measurements allow you to determinee the residual source strength and optimize the remediation strategy accordingly"
How to assess and control groundwater migration risk:
iFLUX provides insight in dynamic and complex process:
Figure: Groundwater and Mass Fluxes VOC and Nickel - map with the monitoring wells located
After the first iteration a stable Nickel plume was confirmed. Most measured values were less than 0,5 mg/m²/day, which was a factor of 30 lower than the water flux expressed in cm/d at corresponding depths. Because of this, further active remediation of residual Nickel contamination was no longer deemed necessary by the supervising authority. A risk- based management approach was approved for coming years, which could probably avoid an extensive and expensive remediation process.
Subsequently, in the second and third iteration, only CVOC’s were measured. Before the flux measurements, unexpected results were found in the concentration measurements (in P43). The stratification of the pollution was different than expected.
By adding flux measurements, it was possible to interpret these results with more certainty and to adapt the contaminant transport model accordingly. The groundwater flow model has been calibrated according to these results.
Figure: Measured mass fluxes (mg/m²/day) at different depths (in meters)
Figure: Measured groundwater flux (cm/day per depth) and nickel (mg/m²/day) at different depths.